VALIDATION

Built on independently validated data.

Movement metrics are validated against gold-standard references — force plates, instrumented treadmills, and motion capture — across multiple independent research programs.

Approved wearable:

Validation comes first

Leading institutions validate Plantiga independently before they use it. That validation is the first step, and it is why the platform is trusted across many different fields of research.

Research Partners

NBA

Wearables Program · Fraunhofer Institute

Simon Fraser University

Burnaby, BC, Canada

University of British Columbia

Vancouver, BC, Canada

Auckland University of Technology

Auckland, New Zealand

Australian Catholic University

Melbourne, Australia

Other institutions worldwide

Validation as a first step before use

NBA Wearables Program, Fraunhofer Institute

Plantiga was validated through the NBA Wearables Program, a joint initiative of the NBA and the NBPA that independently vets wearable technologies before they are approved for use.

Validation

Testing was conducted at the Fraunhofer Institute in Germany, against the gold standards, over a period of several months.

Plantiga passed on every metric on the platform. The program tested the technology under controlled, independent conditions rather than relying on manufacturer-reported data.


Scope

All platform metrics

Reference

Force plates, motion capture, IMUs

Duration

Several months

Validation in three layers

The metrics are the foundation. With those validated, the work extends to the technology in real-world conditions, and then to the applications the data is used for.

Validation Layers
Layer 01

Metric validation

Accelerations, decelerations, g-load, speed, distance, gait timing, jump height, RSI, and left-right asymmetries, measured against force plates, instrumented treadmills, and motion capture.

Layer 02

Technology validation

Reliability across footwear, running speeds, surfaces, and sensor placement, and over time, demonstrated week-to-week and month-to-month rather than in a single session.

Layer 03 Current

Application-level validation

Using validated data to study protocols and interventions: measuring what changes movement, and by how much.

Research built on that validation

Because the metrics are independently validated, Plantiga is used as a measurement tool across a wide range of research, well beyond sport performance alone.

Use Cases

Rehab

Return-to-play

Taking the guesswork out of return-to-play decision making with objective data on how athletes move in their actual sporting environment.

Women

Women's biomechanics

Building the research and understanding of how women move, perform, and compete in sport.

Performance

Sport performance and apparel biomechanics

Studying movement and motion quality as they relate to performance and product design.

Surfaces

Sports surface companies

Quantifying how playing and training surfaces change biomechanics and impact loading.

Apparel

Large apparel companies

Measuring how footwear and performance apparel affect movement, loading, and asymmetry.

Healthcare

Neurodegenerative conditions

Understanding disease progression and assessing the efficacy of interventions.

Research Tags
RTP protocols Women's biomechanics Surfaces Orthotics Shoe types Surface types Change-of-direction tests FSHD Parkinson's Curvilinear running

Publications and ongoing projects

Peer-reviewed papers and conference work from independent research groups, summarized below with links to the full studies.

External Studies
External 11 studies

One-Week and Three-Month Reliability of Acceleration Outcomes From an Insole-Embedded IMU During Treadmill Running

Gaiesky, Fridman, Michie, Blazey, Tran, Schneeberg, Napier · Sports Biomechanics

Peak resultant, vertical and anteroposterior accelerations showed good to excellent short-term reliability and moderate to excellent long-term reliability, supporting clinical use of insole-embedded IMUs to measure peak accelerations.

Full paper

Accuracy of Reactive Strength Index (RSI) Assessed with an Instrumented Insole

Lawson, Morris, Jordan · CSB 2020

A deep-learning RSI model from the insole agreed with force-plate RSI to within a 2.1% mean difference, supporting accurate vertical-jump RSI estimates in athletes.

Accuracy of Running Speed Prediction with Smart Insoles

Morris, Lawson, Jordan · CSB 2020

Across 33 treadmill trials, the insoles predicted running speed within roughly 0.15 m/s with low coefficients of variation.

One-Week Reliability of Spatiotemporal Walking Gait Metrics Using Insole-Embedded IMUs

Kim, Li, Gaiesky, Napier · ACSM 2023

Ground contact, swing, single and double limb support and cadence showed excellent week-to-week reliability across walking speeds, with the strongest results at faster speeds.

Full summary

One-Week Reliability of Spatiotemporal Running Gait Characteristics Using Insole-Embedded IMUs

Gaiesky, Kim, Li, Napier · ACSM 2023

Step rate, flight time, swing time, ground contact time and duty factor showed good to excellent one-week reliability, supporting week-to-week tracking.

Full summary

One-Week Reliability of Jump Tests Using an Insole-Embedded IMU

Li, Gaiesky, Kim, Napier · ACSM 2023

Across five common jump tests, every outcome including RSI, jump height, and distance showed high or excellent reliability.

Full summary

Examining Gait Adaptations in Loaded Foot Marches Using Instrumented Insoles

Martin, Sax van der Weyden, Fyock-Martin, Barringer, Newman, Fridman, Caswell · Military Medicine

Instrumented insoles captured shifts in cadence, ground contact, and double-support time during a two-hour loaded march, and their correlation with individual fitness, indicating field-screening potential.

Full paper

IMU Analysis for Greater Diagnostic Value During the Modified 5-0-5 Change of Direction Test

Ryan, Uthoff, McKenzie, Cronin · JSES

In elite netball athletes, the IMU insole reliably measured peak acceleration, deceleration, max speed, and ground contact time during a 5-0-5 test, adding diagnostics beyond timing gates.

Full paper

Variability of Dual-Task Walking Parameters Using In-Shoe Inertial Sensors

Mitchell, Cronin · Health Science Reports

No dual-task gait measure varied more than 6.5% between sessions, with acceptable reliability across three walking protocols, supporting in-shoe sensors for concussion-related gait assessment.

Full paper

Differences in Peak Impact Accelerations Among Foot Strike Patterns in Recreational Runners

Napier, Fridman, Blazey, Tran, Michie, Schneeberg · Frontiers in Sports and Active Living

Insole-embedded IMUs detected meaningful differences in peak acceleration across rearfoot, midfoot, and forefoot strike patterns, indicating these groups should be analyzed separately.

Full paper

Effect of Footwear, Running Speed and Location on the Validity of Two Commercially Available IMUs

Napier, Willy, Hannigan, McCann, Menon · Frontiers in Sports and Active Living

The Plantiga insole IMU was comparable to a tibia-mounted IMU as a surrogate for average vertical loading rate, with the relationship strengthening at faster running speeds.

Full paper
Ongoing Partners
Ongoing University partners

NBA Wearables Program · Fraunhofer Institute

Independent, joint NBA / NBPA program

Validation across all platform metrics against gold-standard motion capture.

John Cronin

Auckland University of Technology

Validation: jump testing, Reactive Strength Index, and others.

Chris Napier

University of British Columbia

Observational: running injuries, improved outcomes with coaching plus monitoring.

Stuart Cormack

Australian Catholic University

Validation: speed and distance.

Internal Studies
Internal 5 reports

Single Leg Jump Validation

Against a Kistler dual force-plate platform, jump height and distance both reached an r-squared of 0.99.

Full report

Gait Metrics Validation

Against an instrumented treadmill, gait metrics were predicted with a maximum error IQR of 1.6% for single-leg and 6.1% for double-leg metrics.

Full report

Speed Validation

Across outdoor walking and running from 1.5 to 4.8 m/s, speed was predicted within -0.24% error and distance within 1.93% error, both at R-squared of 1.00.

Full report

Ground Interaction Algorithm Validation

Across jumps, walking, running, and in-place activities on a dual force-plate system, takeoff and landing detection showed median errors of 0 ms.

Full report

Reactive Strength Index (RSI) Validation

Against a Kistler dual force plate, RSI from the insoles reached an r-squared of 0.985.

Full report
White Papers
White Papers 3 papers

Capturing Gait and Jump Data with Plantiga Insoles

An overview of the gait and jump parameters Plantiga measures, and how the sensor-embedded insole captures them at each foot strike.

Full white paper

Plantiga's Machine Learning Platform

How the platform was designed for machine learning, producing high-quality tagged data, illustrated with a human movement recognition case study.

Full white paper

Effect of Load Carriage on Gait

A small-scale study using machine learning to quantify how the body reacts to load, relevant to military training, hiking, and injury prevention.

Full white paper
Military
Military Dept. of National Defence

IDEaS Program 1B: Predicting Load, Injury Risk and Progression with Sensor Insoles

Work across two research contracts for the Canadian Department of National Defence, producing a predictive load-carriage readiness score and a predictive movement-health score for real-world monitoring.

Full report
Key References
Key References Background reading